Who is better, Kaziyski or Abramova?
Matey Kaziyski leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Nelli Abramova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Matey Kaziyski and Nelli Abramova level at 82.6. Matey Kaziyski leads on Longevity. Nelli Abramova leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kaziyski wins: Longevity
Abramova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/matey-kaziyski-vs-nelli-abramova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kaziyski leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇬 Kaziyski | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 718 |
| 🇷🇺 Abramova | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 278 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KaziyskiActive | AbramovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 4 | — |
| Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| Club World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 22 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 4 |
| National team years | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Matey Kaziyski leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Nelli Abramova — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Abramova scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Kaziyski leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kaziyski: 82.6, Abramova: 82.6.
Make your case for Kaziyski vs Abramova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.