Who is better, Kaziyski or Dal Zotto?
Matey Kaziyski leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Renan Dal Zotto — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Matey Kaziyski above Renan Dal Zotto: 82.6 vs 82.5. Matey Kaziyski leads on Longevity. Renan Dal Zotto leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kaziyski wins: Longevity
Dal Zotto wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/matey-kaziyski-vs-renan-dal-zotto
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kaziyski leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇬 Kaziyski | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 718 |
| 🇧🇷 Dal Zotto | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 48 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KaziyskiActive | Dal ZottoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 4 | — |
| Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| Club World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 22 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Cup medals | — | 1 |
| South American titles | — | 4 |
| Brazil caps | — | 280 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Matey Kaziyski leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Renan Dal Zotto — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dal Zotto scores higher on peak, statistics. Kaziyski leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kaziyski: 82.6, Dal Zotto: 82.5.
Make your case for Kaziyski vs Dal Zotto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.