Who is better, Kaziyski or T. Crabb?
Taylor Crabb leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.6 for Matey Kaziyski — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Taylor Crabb above Matey Kaziyski: 82.8 vs 82.6. Taylor Crabb leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours. Matey Kaziyski leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →T. Crabb wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Kaziyski wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/matey-kaziyski-vs-taylor-crabb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
T. Crabb leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇬 Kaziyski | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 718 |
| 🇺🇸 T. Crabb | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KaziyskiActive | T. CrabbActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Italian league titles | 4 | — |
| Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| Club World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 22 | — |
| AVP titles | — | 12 |
| World Tour medals | — | 4 |
| AVP best defender awards | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Taylor Crabb leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.6 for Matey Kaziyski — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kaziyski scores higher on longevity. T. Crabb leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kaziyski: 82.6, T. Crabb: 82.8.
Make your case for Kaziyski vs T. Crabb. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.