GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ekholm vs Eguchi

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EkholmWinner
82.8

Ekholm wins: Longevity

Eguchi
82.8

Eguchi wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/matilda-ekholm-vs-fujie-eguchi

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Matilda Ekholm
82.8

Ekholm leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. European doubles champion and a long-serving Swedish number one.

1. Matilda Ekholm
82.8
2. Fujie Eguchi
82.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇸🇪 Matilda Ekholm5 seasons played · career day 1,825261 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Fujie Eguchi5 seasons played · career day 1,82515 titles
-94.3% vs Ekholm at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Ekholm004594261533
🇯🇵 Eguchi00891520

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricEkholmRetiredEguchiRetired
European Championship titles2
European medals4
Swedish titles9
Olympic appearances2
World ranking peak16
World singles titles2
World Championship golds4
World Championship medals6
National titles3
Career highest world ranking1
Dominance w25%7686
Peak w20%8894
Longevity w20%8862
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ekholm82.8
Eguchi82.8
The people
Ekholm
Eguchi

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ekholm vs Eguchi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →