Who is better, Wilander or Connolly?
Mats Wilander leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Maureen Connolly — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mats Wilander and Maureen Connolly level at 82.4. Mats Wilander leads on Longevity. Maureen Connolly leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wilander wins: Longevity
Connolly wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mats-wilander-vs-maureen-connolly
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wilander leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Wilander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 30 |
| 🇺🇸 Connolly | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 29 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Mats Wilander leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Maureen Connolly — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Connolly scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Wilander leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilander: 82.4, Connolly: 82.4.
Make your case for Wilander vs Connolly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.