Who is better, MATUMBAMAN or TaZ?
Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for TaZ — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen above TaZ: 84.2 vs 84.1. Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours. TaZ leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →MATUMBAMAN wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
TaZ wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/matumbaman-dota-vs-taz
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
MATUMBAMAN leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 MATUMBAMAN | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 722 |
| 🇵🇱 TaZ | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 388 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MATUMBAMANRetired | TaZRetired |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 1 | — |
| The International finals | 2 | — |
| Major titles | 4 | — |
| The International appearances | 7 | — |
| Professional seasons | 10 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| World Championship titles | — | 3 |
| Years at tier-one level | — | 18 |
| Big event titles | — | 22 |
| Major playoff runs | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for TaZ — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
TaZ scores higher on longevity. MATUMBAMAN leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. MATUMBAMAN: 84.2, TaZ: 84.1.
Make your case for MATUMBAMAN vs TaZ. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.