GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

McLoughlin vs Krajicek

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McLoughlinWinner
80.3

McLoughlin wins: Dominance, Honours

Krajicek
80.3

Krajicek wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/maurice-mcloughlin-vs-richard-krajicek

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Maurice McLoughlin
80.3

McLoughlin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The 'California Comet' who won back-to-back US Championships.

1. Maurice McLoughlin
80.3
2. Richard Krajicek
80.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Maurice McLoughlin5 seasons played · career day 1,82515 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇱 Richard Krajicek5 seasons played · career day 2,5558 titles
-46.7% vs McLoughlin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 McLoughlin00131522
🇳🇱 Krajicek0000513

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMcLoughlinRetiredKrajicekRetired
US Championships titles2
Grand Slam doubles titles2
Davis Cup titles1
World No. 1 rankings1
Career span in years11
Grand Slam singles titles1
ATP titles17
Career-high ranking4
Masters titles2
Career match wins411
Dominance w25%8074
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%6878
Honours w20%8076
Statistics w15%8284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
McLoughlin80.3
Krajicek80.3
The people
McLoughlin
Krajicek

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for McLoughlin vs Krajicek. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →