Who is better, McLoughlin or Krajicek?
Maurice McLoughlin leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Richard Krajicek — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Maurice McLoughlin and Richard Krajicek level at 80.3. Maurice McLoughlin leads on Dominance, Honours. Richard Krajicek leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McLoughlin wins: Dominance, Honours
Krajicek wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/maurice-mcloughlin-vs-richard-krajicek
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McLoughlin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McLoughlin | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 22 |
| 🇳🇱 Krajicek | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McLoughlinRetired | KrajicekRetired |
|---|---|---|
| US Championships titles | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| World No. 1 rankings | 1 | — |
| Career span in years | 11 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| ATP titles | — | 17 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 4 |
| Masters titles | — | 2 |
| Career match wins | — | 411 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Maurice McLoughlin leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Richard Krajicek — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Krajicek scores higher on statistics, longevity. McLoughlin leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McLoughlin: 80.3, Krajicek: 80.3.
Make your case for McLoughlin vs Krajicek. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.