GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bentley vs MacKinnon

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BentleyWinner
82.9

Bentley wins: Peak, Honours

MacKinnon
82.9

MacKinnon wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/max-bentley-vs-nathan-mackinnon

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Max Bentley
82.9

Bentley leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Hart Trophy winner in 1946 and a three-time Stanley Cup champion.

1. Max Bentley
82.9
2. Nathan MacKinnon
82.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Max Bentley5 seasons played · career day 1,826342 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Nathan MacKinnon5 seasons played · career day 1,825303 points
-11.4% vs Bentley at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Bentley0050109255685
🇨🇦 MacKinnon0063101303648

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBentleyRetiredMacKinnonActive
Stanley Cups31
Hart Trophies11
Scoring titles2
Lady Byng Trophies1
Career points544
Art Ross Trophies1
NHL points950
100-point seasons4
All-Star selections7
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%7476
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bentley82.9
MacKinnon82.9
The people
Bentley
MacKinnon

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bentley vs MacKinnon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →