GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Aoki vs Auböck

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AokiWinner
78.7

Aoki wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Auböck
78.6

Auböck wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/mayumi-aoki-vs-felix-auboeck

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Mayumi Aoki
78.7

Aoki leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic 100 m butterfly champion in Munich 1972 in a world record time.

1. Mayumi Aoki
78.7
2. Felix Auböck
78.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇯🇵 Mayumi Aoki5 seasons played · career day 1,825379 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇹 Felix Auböck5 seasons played · career day 2,55529 major golds
-92.3% vs Aoki at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Aoki0055121379571
🇦🇹 Auböck00001444

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAokiRetiredAuböckActive
Olympic gold medals1
World records1
Asian Games golds2
Japanese national titles8
Olympic Games contested2
European titles1
Short-course world medals1
Olympic finals2
National records10
Olympic appearances3
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%6278
Honours w20%8274
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Aoki78.7
Auböck78.6
The people
Aoki
Auböck

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Aoki vs Auböck. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →