GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Lanning vs Edwards

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LanningWinner
88.7

Lanning wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Edwards
87.0

Edwards wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/meg-lanning-vs-charlotte-edwards

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Meg Lanning
88.7

Lanning leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Seven World Cups as captain — the most successful skipper in the sport.

1. Meg Lanning
88.7
2. Charlotte Edwards
87.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Meg Lanning5 years played · career day 2,190277 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Charlotte Edwards5 years played · career day 2,19122 runs
-92.1% vs Lanning at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Lanning00045217472
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Edwards00031240

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLanningRetiredEdwardsRetired
World Cup titles71
ODI centuries15
International runs8,35210,273
ODI average53.51
Commonwealth golds1
Wins as captain150
T20 World Cup titles1
International centuries9
England caps309
Dominance w25%8884
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%8290
Honours w20%9286
Statistics w15%9088

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Lanning88.7
Edwards87.0
The people
Lanning
Edwards

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Lanning vs Edwards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →