Who is better, Meiko or Yatoro?
Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Tian "Meiko" Ye — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk above Tian "Meiko" Ye: 86.8 vs 86.7. Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Tian "Meiko" Ye leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Yatoro wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Meiko wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/meiko-lol-vs-yatoro-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Yatoro leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Meiko | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 374 | 732 |
| 🇺🇦 Yatoro | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 432 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MeikoActive | YatoroActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| LPL titles | 4 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 7 | — |
| Professional seasons | 12 | 7 |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| The International MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Illya "Yatoro" Mulyarchuk leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Tian "Meiko" Ye — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Meiko scores higher on longevity. Yatoro leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Meiko: 86.7, Yatoro: 86.8.
Make your case for Meiko vs Yatoro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.