Who is better, Renfro or Dent?
Mel Renfro leads with a GOAT score of 88.9 against 88.9 for Richard Dent — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Renfro vs Dent
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mel Renfro and Richard Dent level at 88.9. Mel Renfro leads on Longevity. Richard Dent leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RenfroWinner
88.9Renfro wins: Longevity
Dent
88.9Dent wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/mel-renfro-vs-richard-dent
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Mel Renfro
88.9
Renfro leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mel Renfro
2. Richard Dent
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Richard Dent5 seasons played · career day 1,825386 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Mel Renfro5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 touchdowns
-2.1% vs Dent at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Renfro | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 705 |
| 🇺🇸 Dent | 0 | 0 | 50 | 116 | 386 | 701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Renfro88.9
Dent88.9
FAQ
Where does Dent beat Renfro?
Dent scores higher on peak. Renfro leads on longevity.
How is the Renfro vs Dent score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Renfro: 88.9, Dent: 88.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Renfro vs Dent. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.