Who is better, Ottey or Richards-Ross?
Merlene Ottey leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Merlene Ottey above Sanya Richards-Ross: 87.6 vs 87.5. Merlene Ottey leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sanya Richards-Ross leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ottey wins: Longevity, Statistics
Richards-Ross wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/merlene-ottey-vs-sanya-richards-ross
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ottey leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Ottey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 22 |
| 🇺🇸 Richards-Ross | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 147.51 | 345.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OtteyRetired | Richards-RossRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 9 | — |
| World Championship medals | 14 | 8 |
| Olympic appearances | 7 | — |
| 200m best (sec) | 21.64 | — |
| World Indoor golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| 400m best (sec) | — | 48.7 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Merlene Ottey leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richards-Ross scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Ottey leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ottey: 87.6, Richards-Ross: 87.5.
Make your case for Ottey vs Richards-Ross. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.