GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Atherton vs Duckett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AthertonWinner
81.1

Atherton wins: Longevity

Duckett
81.0

Duckett wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/michael-atherton-vs-ben-duckett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Michael Atherton
81.1

Atherton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. England's long-serving captain who scored 7,728 Test runs at the top of the order.

1. Michael Atherton
81.1
2. Ben Duckett
81.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Ben Duckett5 years played · career day 1,825279 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Michael Atherton5 years played · career day 1,825274 runs
-1.8% vs Duckett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Atherton003580274610
🇬🇧 Duckett004595279601

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAthertonRetiredDuckettActive
Test runs7,7283,000
Tests played115
Test centuries166
Tests as captain54
Highest score185
Highest Test score182
One-day international centuries3
Strike rate in Tests87
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8276
Honours w20%7474
Statistics w15%8690

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Atherton81.1
Duckett81.0
The people
Atherton
Duckett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Atherton vs Duckett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →