Who is better, Ballack or Conti?
Michael Ballack leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Pamela Conti — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Michael Ballack and Pamela Conti level at 80.5. Michael Ballack leads on Peak, Honours. Pamela Conti leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ballack wins: Peak, Honours
Conti wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/michael-ballack-vs-pamela-conti-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ballack leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Ballack | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 73 |
| 🇮🇹 Conti | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 286 | 578 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BallackRetired | ContiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Bundesliga titles | 3 | — |
| Premier League titles | 1 | — |
| German Footballer of the Year awards | 3 | — |
| Germany caps | 98 | — |
| Germany goals | 42 | — |
| Italy caps | — | 100 |
| Serie A titles | — | 3 |
| Coppa Italia titles | — | 2 |
| Italy goals | — | 20 |
| Career appearances | — | 350 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Michael Ballack leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Pamela Conti — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Conti scores higher on longevity. Ballack leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ballack: 80.5, Conti: 80.5.
Make your case for Ballack vs Conti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.