GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Holding vs Gilchrist

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HoldingWinner
87.5

Holding wins: Dominance, Peak

Gilchrist
86.5

Gilchrist wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/michael-holding-vs-adam-gilchrist

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇲 Michael Holding
87.5

Holding leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Whispering Death: 249 Test wickets in the great West Indies pace attack.

1. Michael Holding
87.5
2. Adam Gilchrist
86.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Adam Gilchrist5 years played · career day 4,382285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Michael Holding5 years played · career day 2,921104 runs
-63.5% vs Gilchrist at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇲 Holding000010122
🇦🇺 Gilchrist00000108

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHoldingRetiredGilchristRetired
Test wickets249
Tests played60
Best innings figures8
World Cup titles1
Test bowling average23.68
World Cups3
Test runs5,570
ODI runs9,619
Test dismissals416
Test strike rate81.95
Test centuries17
Dominance w25%8884
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%7882
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Holding87.5
Gilchrist86.5
The people
Holding
Gilchrist

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Holding vs Gilchrist. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →