GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Stich vs Dimitrov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
StichWinner
79.1

Stich wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Dimitrov
79.1

Dimitrov wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/michael-stich-vs-grigor-dimitrov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Michael Stich
79.1

Stich leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon champion in 1991 and an Olympic doubles gold medallist.

1. Michael Stich
79.1
2. Grigor Dimitrov
79.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇪 Michael Stich5 seasons played · career day 1,826389 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇬 Grigor Dimitrov5 seasons played · career day 2,92111 titles
-97.2% vs Stich at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Stich0055124302642
🇧🇬 Dimitrov0000114

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricStichRetiredDimitrovActive
Major singles titles1
Major finals3
Olympic gold medals1
Career singles titles18
Career-high world ranking2
ATP Finals titles1
ATP titles9
Masters 1000 titles1
Career-high ranking3
Career match wins450
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%6886
Honours w20%8072
Statistics w15%8082

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Stich79.1
Dimitrov79.1
The people
Stich
Dimitrov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Stich vs Dimitrov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →