Who is better, Stich or Tanner?
Michael Stich leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.0 for Roscoe Tanner — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Stich vs Tanner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Stich above Roscoe Tanner: 79.1 vs 79.0. Michael Stich leads on Dominance, Honours. Roscoe Tanner leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
StichWinner
79.1Stich wins: Dominance, Honours
Tanner
79.0Tanner wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/michael-stich-vs-roscoe-tanner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Michael Stich
79.1
Stich leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Michael Stich
2. Roscoe Tanner
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇪 Michael Stich5 seasons played · career day 1,826389 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Roscoe Tanner5 seasons played · career day 2,55610 titles
-97.4% vs Stich at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Stich | 0 | 0 | 55 | 124 | 302 | 642 |
| 🇺🇸 Tanner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StichRetired | TannerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Career singles titles | 18 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| ATP titles | — | 16 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 4 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Stich79.1
Tanner79.0
FAQ
Where does Tanner beat Stich?
Tanner scores higher on statistics, longevity. Stich leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Stich vs Tanner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stich: 79.1, Tanner: 79.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Stich vs Tanner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.