GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Stich vs Johansson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
StichWinner
79.1

Stich wins: Dominance, Honours

Johansson
79.0

Johansson wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/michael-stich-vs-thomas-johansson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Michael Stich
79.1

Stich leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon champion in 1991 and an Olympic doubles gold medallist.

1. Michael Stich
79.1
2. Thomas Johansson
79.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇪 Michael Stich5 seasons played · career day 1,826389 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Thomas Johansson5 seasons played · career day 2,1906 titles
-98.5% vs Stich at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇪 Stich0055124302642
🇸🇪 Johansson000159

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricStichRetiredJohanssonRetired
Major singles titles1
Major finals3
Olympic gold medals1
Career singles titles18
Career-high world ranking2
Grand Slam singles titles1
ATP titles9
Olympic golds1
Davis Cup finals2
Career-high ranking7
Dominance w25%7870
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%6880
Honours w20%8076
Statistics w15%8082

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Stich79.1
Johansson79.0
The people
Stich
Johansson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Stich vs Johansson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →