Who is better, Akers or Courtois?
Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Michelle Akers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois above Michelle Akers: 89.1 vs 89.0. Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads on Longevity, Dominance. Michelle Akers leads on Peak, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Courtois wins: Dominance, Longevity
Akers wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/michelle-akers-vs-thibaut-courtois
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Courtois leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Akers — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | AkersRetired | CourtoisActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup Golden Boot awards | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| USA goals | 105 | — |
| USA caps | 153 | — |
| League appearances | — | 479 |
| Belgium caps | — | 115 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| La Liga titles | — | 4 |
| Yashin Trophy | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 85 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Michelle Akers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Akers scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Courtois leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Akers: 89.0, Courtois: 89.1.
Make your case for Akers vs Courtois. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.