Who is better, Ahye or Akimenko?
Michelle-Lee Ahye leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.7 for Mikhail Akimenko — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Michelle-Lee Ahye and Mikhail Akimenko level at 79.7. Michelle-Lee Ahye leads on Longevity, Statistics. Mikhail Akimenko leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ahye wins: Longevity, Statistics
Akimenko wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/michelle-lee-ahye-vs-mikhail-akimenko
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ahye leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇹 Ahye | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.08 | 76.63 |
| 🇷🇺 Akimenko | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 363 | 478 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AhyeActive | AkimenkoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | 1 |
| 100 m personal best | 10.82 | — |
| 200 m personal best | 22.25 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 233 |
| European Indoor medals | — | 1 |
| National titles | — | 2 |
| Diamond League podiums | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Michelle-Lee Ahye leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.7 for Mikhail Akimenko — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Akimenko scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Ahye leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ahye: 79.7, Akimenko: 79.7.
Make your case for Ahye vs Akimenko. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.