Who is better, Cochrane or Hoyt?
Mickey Cochrane leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.2 for Waite Hoyt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mickey Cochrane and Waite Hoyt level at 86.2. Mickey Cochrane leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Waite Hoyt leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cochrane wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Hoyt wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mickey-cochrane-vs-waite-hoyt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cochrane leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cochrane | 0 | 0 | 0.331 | 0.604 | 1.566 | 2.887 |
| 🇺🇸 Hoyt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 48 | 110 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Mickey Cochrane leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 86.2 for Waite Hoyt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hoyt scores higher on statistics, longevity. Cochrane leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cochrane: 86.2, Hoyt: 86.2.
Make your case for Cochrane vs Hoyt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.