Who is better, Du Preez or Sciver-Brunt?
Mignon du Preez leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Nat Sciver-Brunt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Mignon du Preez and Nat Sciver-Brunt level at 85.4. Mignon du Preez leads on Longevity, Statistics. Nat Sciver-Brunt leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Du Preez wins: Longevity, Statistics
Sciver-Brunt wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/mignon-du-preez-vs-nat-sciver-brunt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Du Preez leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Du Preez | 0 | 0 | 22 | 50 | 168 | 366 |
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 316 | 652 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Du PreezRetired | Sciver-BruntActive |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 3,760 | 4,000 |
| T20I runs | 2,000 | — |
| ODI matches | 154 | — |
| Matches as captain | 100 | — |
| International seasons | 16 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| ODI centuries | — | 9 |
| International wickets | — | 150 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteMignon du Preez leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Nat Sciver-Brunt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sciver-Brunt scores higher on dominance, honours. Du Preez leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Du Preez: 85.4, Sciver-Brunt: 85.4.
Make your case for Du Preez vs Sciver-Brunt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.