Who is better, Canto or Halmich?
Miguel Canto leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Regina Halmich — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Canto vs Halmich
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Miguel Canto and Regina Halmich level at 86.4. Miguel Canto leads on Peak. Regina Halmich leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CantoWinner
86.4Canto wins: Peak
Halmich
86.4Halmich wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/miguel-canto-vs-regina-halmich
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇽 Miguel Canto
86.4
Canto leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Miguel Canto
2. Regina Halmich
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇲🇽 Miguel Canto5 years played · career day 1,825280 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Regina Halmich5 years played · career day 1,82529 title wins
-89.6% vs Canto at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Canto | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 628 |
| 🇩🇪 Halmich | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 29 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Canto86.4
Halmich86.4
FAQ
Where does Halmich beat Canto?
Halmich scores higher on longevity. Canto leads on peak.
How is the Canto vs Halmich score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Canto: 86.4, Halmich: 86.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Canto vs Halmich. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.