GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Appelgren vs Zhang Jike

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Zhang JikeWinner
77.0

Zhang Jike wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Appelgren
74.2

Appelgren wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/mikael-appelgren-vs-zhang-jike

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Zhang Jike
77.0

Zhang Jike leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Completed the Grand Slam in 445 days — the fastest ever.

1. Zhang Jike
77.0
2. Mikael Appelgren
74.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Zhang Jike5 seasons played · career day 4,38234 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Mikael Appelgren5 seasons played · career day 2,92126 titles
-23.5% vs Zhang Jike at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 Appelgren0000931
🇨🇳 Zhang Jike0000010

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAppelgrenRetiredZhang JikeRetired
European Championship singles titles3
World team titles24
World Cup titles12
European team titles6
World Championship medals8
Years at top level19
Olympic golds2
World Championship singles titles2
Grand Slams completed1
ITTF Tour titles9
Dominance w25%6876
Peak w20%7884
Longevity w20%8270
Honours w20%7279
Statistics w15%7276

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Zhang Jike77.0
Appelgren74.2
The people
Appelgren
Zhang Jike

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Appelgren vs Zhang Jike. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →