Who is better, Brearley or Verma?
Shafali Verma leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Mike Brearley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shafali Verma above Mike Brearley: 83.9 vs 83.8. Shafali Verma leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Mike Brearley leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Verma wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Brearley wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/mike-brearley-vs-shafali-verma
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Verma leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Brearley | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 259 | 528 |
| 🇮🇳 Verma | 0 | 0 | 30 | 72 | 216 | 324 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrearleyRetired | VermaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Tests as captain | 31 | — |
| Tests won as captain | 18 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 3 | — |
| First-class runs | 25,185 | — |
| First-class centuries | 45 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Under-19 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| T20I runs | — | 2,000 |
| Career best T20I ranking | — | 1 |
| Test double centuries | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 92 |
Shafali Verma leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Mike Brearley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brearley scores higher on honours, longevity. Verma leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brearley: 83.8, Verma: 83.9.
Make your case for Brearley vs Verma. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.