Who is better, Burton or Quadarella?
Simona Quadarella leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Mike Burton — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Simona Quadarella above Mike Burton: 82.2 vs 82.0. Simona Quadarella leads on Longevity, Honours. Mike Burton leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Quadarella wins: Longevity, Honours
Burton wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mike-burton-vs-simona-quadarella
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Quadarella leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Burton | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| 🇮🇹 Quadarella | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 383 | 733 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurtonRetired | QuadarellaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | — |
| World records | 7 | — |
| Pan American golds | 1 | — |
| US national titles | 12 | — |
| Olympic 1500 m titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 7 |
| Italian records | — | 3 |
| Global finals contested | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Simona Quadarella leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Mike Burton — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Burton scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Quadarella leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burton: 82.0, Quadarella: 82.2.
Make your case for Burton vs Quadarella. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.