Who is better, Conley or El Bakkali?
Mike Conley Sr. leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.6 for Soufiane El Bakkali — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mike Conley Sr. above Soufiane El Bakkali: 90.9 vs 90.6. Mike Conley Sr. leads on Longevity. Soufiane El Bakkali leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Conley wins: Longevity
El Bakkali wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mike-conley-sr-vs-soufiane-el-bakkali
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Conley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Conley | 0 | 0 | 58 | 121 | 262 | 698 |
| 🇲🇦 El Bakkali | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,445 | 3,356.08 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConleyRetired | El BakkaliActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World titles | 1 | — |
| World indoor titles | 3 | — |
| Personal best (m) | 18.17 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Steeplechase best | — | 477.08 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 1 |
| Global medals | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Mike Conley Sr. leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.6 for Soufiane El Bakkali — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
El Bakkali scores higher on peak, statistics. Conley leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conley: 90.9, El Bakkali: 90.6.
Make your case for Conley vs El Bakkali. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.