GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Denness vs Bosanquet

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DennessWinner
83.3

Denness wins: Longevity, Statistics

Bosanquet
83.2

Bosanquet wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/mike-denness-vs-bernard-bosanquet

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Mike Denness
83.3

Denness leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Captained England in nineteen Tests and won the 1974 county double.

1. Mike Denness
83.3
2. Bernard Bosanquet
83.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Bernard Bosanquet5 years played · career day 1,824298 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Mike Denness5 years played · career day 1,825262 runs
-12.1% vs Bosanquet at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Denness004594262538
🇬🇧 Bosanquet004597298743

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDennessRetiredBosanquetRetired
Test runs1,667
Tests as captain19
Test centuries4
First-class runs25,88611,696
Seasons played22
First-class wickets629
Test wickets25
Best Test figures8
Tests played7
Dominance w25%7684
Peak w20%8892
Longevity w20%8876
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%9084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Denness83.3
Bosanquet83.2
The people
Denness
Bosanquet

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Denness vs Bosanquet. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →