Who is better, Singletary or Grange?
Red Grange leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mike Singletary — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Red Grange above Mike Singletary: 83.8 vs 83.7. Red Grange leads on Dominance, Peak. Mike Singletary leads on Longevity, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Grange wins: Dominance, Peak
Singletary wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mike-singletary-vs-red-grange
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Grange leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Singletary | 0 | 0 | 80 | 210 | 675 | 1,239 |
| 🇺🇸 Grange | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 388 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SingletaryRetired | GrangeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| Pro Bowl selections | 10 | — |
| All-Pro first teams | 7 | — |
| Career tackles | 1,488 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 2 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 3 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Career touchdowns | — | 32 |
| Tour games in 1925 | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Red Grange leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mike Singletary — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Singletary scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Grange leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Singletary: 83.7, Grange: 83.8.
Make your case for Singletary vs Grange. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.