Who is better, Atherton or Gibson?
Minna Atherton leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.5 for Sarah Gibson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Minna Atherton and Sarah Gibson level at 78.5. Minna Atherton leads on Peak, Statistics. Sarah Gibson leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Atherton wins: Peak, Statistics
Gibson wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/minna-atherton-vs-sarah-gibson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Atherton leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Atherton | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 27 |
| 🇺🇸 Gibson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 356 | 485 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AthertonActive | GibsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Short-course world records | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| World junior titles | 2 | — |
| ISL titles | 1 | — |
| 100 m backstroke short-course best | 54.89 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 1 |
| US national medals | — | 4 |
| World University Games medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in the 100 fly | — | 5,722 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Minna Atherton leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.5 for Sarah Gibson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gibson scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Atherton leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Atherton: 78.5, Gibson: 78.5.
Make your case for Atherton vs Gibson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.