Who is better, Miracle- or Stewie2K?
Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Stewie2K — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi and Stewie2K level at 78.6. Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi leads on Longevity. Stewie2K leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Miracle- wins: Longevity
Stewie2K wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/miracle-vs-stewie2k
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Miracle- leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇴 Miracle- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 38 |
| 🇺🇸 Stewie2K | 0 | 0 | 58 | 132 | 394 | 588 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Miracle-Active | Stewie2KRetired |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 1 | — |
| Major titles | 4 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 5,000,000 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 15 | — |
| MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Years at tier-1 level | 10 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 3 |
| Big event titles | — | 10 |
| Major finals reached | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 80 |
Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.6 for Stewie2K — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stewie2K scores higher on honours. Miracle- leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Miracle-: 78.6, Stewie2K: 78.6.
Make your case for Miracle- vs Stewie2K. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.