Who is better, Klose or Neid?
Miroslav Klose leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Silvia Neid — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Klose vs Neid
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Miroslav Klose and Silvia Neid level at 84.6. Miroslav Klose leads on Dominance, Statistics. Silvia Neid leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KloseWinner
84.6Klose wins: Dominance, Statistics
Neid
84.6Neid wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/miroslav-klose-vs-silvia-neid
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Miroslav Klose
84.6
Klose leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Miroslav Klose
2. Silvia Neid
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇪 Silvia Neid5 seasons played · career day 1,825275 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇪 Miroslav Klose5 seasons played · career day 2,19160 goals
-78.2% vs Neid at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Klose | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 46 | 99 |
| 🇩🇪 Neid | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 589 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Klose84.6
Neid84.6
FAQ
Where does Neid beat Klose?
Neid scores higher on peak. Klose leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Klose vs Neid score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Klose: 84.6, Neid: 84.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Klose vs Neid. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.