GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Misbah vs Van Niekerk

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MisbahWinner
85.9

Misbah wins: Longevity

Van Niekerk
85.9

Van Niekerk wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/misbah-ul-haq-vs-dane-van-niekerk

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Misbah-ul-Haq
85.9

Misbah leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Pakistan's most successful Test captain, taking the side to number one in 2016.

1. Misbah-ul-Haq
85.9
2. Dane van Niekerk
85.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Misbah-ul-Haq5 years played · career day 2,921150 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Dane van Niekerk5 years played · career day 1,825108 runs
-28.0% vs Misbah at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Misbah000044194
🇿🇦 Van Niekerk001230108252

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMisbahRetiredVan NiekerkRetired
Test runs5,222
Test wins as captain26
Test centuries10
Test average46.62
Fastest Test fifty (balls)21
ODI wickets100
T20I wickets68
ODI runs2,000
Matches as captain100
Best T20I figures4
Dominance w25%8282
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8684
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Misbah85.9
Van Niekerk85.9
The people
Misbah
Van Niekerk

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Misbah vs Van Niekerk. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →