Who is better, May-Treanor or Chulak?
Yefim Chulak leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Misty May-Treanor — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yefim Chulak above Misty May-Treanor: 83.0 vs 82.8. Yefim Chulak leads on Honours, Peak, Statistics. Misty May-Treanor leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chulak wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
May-Treanor wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/misty-may-treanor-vs-yefim-chulak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chulak leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 May-Treanor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 53 |
| 🇺🇦 Chulak | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 278 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | May-TreanorRetired | ChulakRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Tournament wins | 112 | — |
| AVP titles | 72 | — |
| Consecutive match wins | 112 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 3 |
| National team years | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Yefim Chulak leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.8 for Misty May-Treanor — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
May-Treanor scores higher on dominance, longevity. Chulak leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. May-Treanor: 82.8, Chulak: 83.0.
Make your case for May-Treanor vs Chulak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.