GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hirano vs Wang Nan

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HiranoWinner
81.4

Hirano wins: Peak, Statistics

Wang Nan
80.8

Wang Nan wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/miu-hirano-vs-wang-nan

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Miu Hirano
81.4

Hirano leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Asian champion in 2017 after beating three Chinese stars in a row.

1. Miu Hirano
81.4
2. Wang Nan
80.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Miu Hirano5 seasons played · career day 2,55559 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Nan5 seasons played · career day 2,55635 titles
-40.7% vs Hirano at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Hirano00004382
🇨🇳 Wang Nan00002049

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHiranoActiveWang NanRetired
Asian Championship golds1
World Cup titles1
Olympic medals1
World Championship medals3
Career-high world ranking5
Olympic golds4
World Championship titles15
World Cup singles titles4
World team titles6
Months at No. 166
ITTF Tour titles30
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%9084
Longevity w20%7676
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hirano81.4
Wang Nan80.8
The people
Hirano
Wang Nan

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hirano vs Wang Nan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →