GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Farah vs Semenya

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SemenyaWinner
87.2

Semenya wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Farah
86.3

Farah wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/mo-farah-vs-caster-semenya

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Caster Semenya
87.2

Semenya leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Two Olympic and three world 800m titles with a 30-race winning run.

1. Caster Semenya
87.2
2. Mo Farah
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇬🇧 Mo Farah5 seasons played · career day 5,1128,033.5 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Caster Semenya5 seasons played · career day 2,191586.5 major golds
-92.7% vs Farah at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Farah000000
🇿🇦 Semenya000115.45350.87941.46

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFarahRetiredSemenyaActive
Olympic golds42
World Championship golds63
European golds5
5000 m best (s)766.59
10,000 m best (s)1,602.52
Major marathon wins1
Commonwealth golds1
800m best (sec)114.25
Consecutive 800m wins30
Dominance w25%8488
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8480
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Semenya87.2
Farah86.3
The people
Farah
Semenya

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Farah vs Semenya. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →