Who is better, De Gennaro or Stoklos?
Monica De Gennaro leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Randy Stoklos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Monica De Gennaro and Randy Stoklos level at 87.8. Monica De Gennaro leads on Honours. Randy Stoklos leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →De Gennaro wins: Honours
Stoklos wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/monica-de-gennaro-vs-randy-stoklos
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
De Gennaro leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 De Gennaro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 |
| 🇺🇸 Stoklos | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 63 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | De GennaroActive | StoklosRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 5 | — |
| Best libero awards | 8 | — |
| Italian league titles | 7 | — |
| Career beach titles | — | 122 |
| AVP MVP awards | — | 3 |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Years on tour | — | 18 |
| Career prize money in dollars | — | 1,500,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Monica De Gennaro leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Randy Stoklos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stoklos scores higher on dominance, statistics. De Gennaro leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. De Gennaro: 87.8, Stoklos: 87.8.
Make your case for De Gennaro vs Stoklos. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.