Who is better, Goheen or MacKinnon?
Moose Goheen leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Nathan MacKinnon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Moose Goheen above Nathan MacKinnon: 83.0 vs 82.9. Moose Goheen leads on Longevity, Honours. Nathan MacKinnon leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Goheen wins: Longevity, Honours
MacKinnon wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/moose-goheen-vs-nathan-mackinnon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goheen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Goheen | 0 | 0 | 52 | 111 | 327 | 676 |
| 🇨🇦 MacKinnon | 0 | 0 | 63 | 101 | 303 | 648 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoheenRetired | MacKinnonActive · Colorado Avalanche |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| United States national titles | 2 | — |
| Senior seasons | 18 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 2 | — |
| International appearances | 20 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 1 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 950 |
| 100-point seasons | — | 4 |
| All-Star selections | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Moose Goheen leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Nathan MacKinnon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MacKinnon scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Goheen leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goheen: 83.0, MacKinnon: 82.9.
Make your case for Goheen vs MacKinnon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.