Who is better, Kiptanui or Gunnell?
Sally Gunnell leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Moses Kiptanui — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sally Gunnell above Moses Kiptanui: 86.0 vs 85.9. Sally Gunnell leads on Longevity, Honours. Moses Kiptanui leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gunnell wins: Longevity, Honours
Kiptanui wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/moses-kiptanui-vs-sally-gunnell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gunnell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Kiptanui | 0 | 0 | 0 | 485 | 1,925.97 | 3,861.56 |
| 🇬🇧 Gunnell | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 250 | 678 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KiptanuiRetired | GunnellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 3 | 1 |
| World records | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Steeplechase best (sec) | 477.59 | — |
| World titles in a row | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth Games golds | — | 2 |
| World record 400 m hurdles | — | 52.74 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Sally Gunnell leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Moses Kiptanui — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kiptanui scores higher on dominance, statistics. Gunnell leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kiptanui: 85.9, Gunnell: 86.0.
Make your case for Kiptanui vs Gunnell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.