GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Mushtaq vs Collingwood

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MushtaqWinner
85.8

Mushtaq wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Collingwood
85.8

Collingwood wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/mushtaq-ahmed-vs-paul-collingwood

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Mushtaq Ahmed
85.8

Mushtaq leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Leg-spinner in Pakistan's 1992 World Cup-winning side.

1. Mushtaq Ahmed
85.8
2. Paul Collingwood
85.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Mushtaq Ahmed5 years played · career day 1,825286 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Paul Collingwood5 years played · career day 1,826268 runs
-6.3% vs Mushtaq at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Mushtaq004596286626
🇬🇧 Collingwood004594206562

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMushtaqRetiredCollingwoodRetired
World Cup titles1
Test wickets185
First-class wickets1,407
One-day international wickets161
Ten-wicket Test matches3
World Twenty20 titles as captain1
Test runs4,259
One-day international runs5,092
Test centuries10
International caps264
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8690
Honours w20%8486
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Mushtaq85.8
Collingwood85.8
The people
Mushtaq
Collingwood

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Mushtaq vs Collingwood. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →