Who is better, Mushtaq or Alderman?
Mushtaq Ahmed leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Terry Alderman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mushtaq Ahmed above Terry Alderman: 85.8 vs 85.7. Mushtaq Ahmed leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Terry Alderman leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mushtaq wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Alderman wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/mushtaq-ahmed-vs-terry-alderman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mushtaq leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Mushtaq | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 286 | 626 |
| 🇦🇺 Alderman | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MushtaqRetired | AldermanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Test wickets | 185 | 170 |
| First-class wickets | 1,407 | 956 |
| One-day international wickets | 161 | — |
| Ten-wicket Test matches | 3 | — |
| Wickets in the 1981 Ashes | — | 42 |
| Wickets in the 1989 Ashes | — | 41 |
| Five-wicket hauls | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Mushtaq Ahmed leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Terry Alderman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alderman scores higher on peak, dominance. Mushtaq leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mushtaq: 85.8, Alderman: 85.7.
Make your case for Mushtaq vs Alderman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.