Who is better, Nadal or Gonzales?
Rafael Nadal leads with a GOAT score of 93.1 against 92.9 for Pancho Gonzales — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rafael Nadal above Pancho Gonzales: 93.1 vs 92.9. Rafael Nadal leads on Honours, Dominance. Pancho Gonzales leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nadal wins: Dominance, Honours
Gonzales wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/nadal-vs-pancho-gonzales
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nadal leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Gonzales — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NadalRetired | GonzalesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 22 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 209 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 36 | — |
| Career titles | 92 | — |
| Match win % | 83% | — |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 5 | — |
| Olympic gold | 2 | — |
| Amateur Grand Slam titles | — | 2 |
| World professional titles | — | 8 |
| Pro tour tournament wins | — | 113 |
| US Pro titles | — | 8 |
| Career span in years | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Rafael Nadal leads with a GOAT score of 93.1 against 92.9 for Pancho Gonzales — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gonzales scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Nadal leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nadal: 93.1, Gonzales: 92.9.
Make your case for Nadal vs Gonzales. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.