Who is better, Nadim or Lavelle?
Nadia Nadim leads with a GOAT score of 85.9 against 85.9 for Rose Lavelle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Nadia Nadim and Rose Lavelle level at 85.9. Nadia Nadim leads on Longevity, Statistics. Rose Lavelle leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nadim wins: Longevity, Statistics
Lavelle wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/nadia-nadim-v-vs-rose-lavelle-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nadim leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Nadim | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 288 | 588 |
| 🇺🇸 Lavelle | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 400 | 764 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NadimActive | LavelleActive |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship finals | 1 | — |
| Denmark caps | 105 | — |
| Denmark goals | 40 | — |
| League titles | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Cup Bronze Ball awards | — | 1 |
| United States caps | — | 105 |
| United States goals | — | 25 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 85 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Nadia Nadim leads with a GOAT score of 85.9 against 85.9 for Rose Lavelle — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lavelle scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Nadim leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nadim: 85.9, Lavelle: 85.9.
Make your case for Nadim vs Lavelle. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.