GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Petrova vs Sharapova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PetrovaWinner
82.2

Petrova wins: Longevity, Statistics

Sharapova
82.2

Sharapova wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/nadia-petrova-vs-maria-sharapova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Nadia Petrova
82.2

Petrova leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Former world number three with 13 WTA singles titles.

1. Nadia Petrova
82.2
2. Maria Sharapova
82.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇷🇺 Nadia Petrova5 seasons played · career day 2,92199 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Maria Sharapova5 seasons played · career day 2,55514 titles
-85.9% vs Petrova at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇷🇺 Petrova000070102
🇷🇺 Sharapova0000917

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricPetrovaRetiredSharapovaRetired
WTA singles titles13
WTA doubles titles24
Career high ranking3
Grand Slam semi-finals3
Olympic medals11
Grand Slam titles5
Career Grand Slams1
Career titles36
Weeks at No. 121
Tour Finals titles1
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%8682
Honours w20%7682
Statistics w15%8882

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Petrova82.2
Sharapova82.2
The people
Petrova
Sharapova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Petrova vs Sharapova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →