Who is better, Thiam or Boston?
Nafissatou Thiam leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Ralph Boston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Nafissatou Thiam and Ralph Boston level at 86.3. Nafissatou Thiam leads on Longevity, Honours. Ralph Boston leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thiam wins: Longevity, Honours
Boston wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/nafissatou-thiam-vs-ralph-boston
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thiam leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 Thiam | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,508 | 33,966 |
| 🇺🇸 Boston | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThiamActive | BostonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European golds | 2 | — |
| Heptathlon best | 7,013 | — |
| World indoor golds | 2 | — |
| High jump best (m) | 2.02 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 6 |
| Best long jump in metres | — | 8.35 |
| AAU titles | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Nafissatou Thiam leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Ralph Boston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boston scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Thiam leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thiam: 86.3, Boston: 86.3.
Make your case for Thiam vs Boston. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.