Who is better, Takahashi or Allen?
Naoko Takahashi leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Nathon Allen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Naoko Takahashi and Nathon Allen level at 80.7. Naoko Takahashi leads on Dominance, Peak. Nathon Allen leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Takahashi wins: Dominance, Peak
Allen wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/naoko-takahashi-vs-nathon-allen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Takahashi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Takahashi | 0 | 0 | 72 | 154 | 432 | 716 |
| 🇯🇲 Allen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 356 | 693 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TakahashiRetired | AllenActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World record marathon | 2.195 | — |
| Berlin Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 1 | — |
| Tokyo Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 1 |
| Personal best (400m) | — | 44.4 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Jamaican national medals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Naoko Takahashi leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Nathon Allen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Allen scores higher on statistics, longevity. Takahashi leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Takahashi: 80.7, Allen: 80.7.
Make your case for Takahashi vs Allen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.