Who is better, Takahashi or Ashmeade?
Naoko Takahashi leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.6 for Nickel Ashmeade — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Takahashi vs Ashmeade
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Naoko Takahashi above Nickel Ashmeade: 80.7 vs 80.6. Naoko Takahashi leads on Dominance, Peak. Nickel Ashmeade leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TakahashiWinner
80.7Takahashi wins: Dominance, Peak
Ashmeade
80.6Ashmeade wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/naoko-takahashi-vs-nickel-ashmeade
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Naoko Takahashi
80.7
Takahashi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Naoko Takahashi
2. Nickel Ashmeade
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇯🇵 Naoko Takahashi5 seasons played · career day 1,825432 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Nickel Ashmeade5 seasons played · career day 2,190100.1 major golds
-76.8% vs Takahashi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Takahashi | 0 | 0 | 72 | 154 | 432 | 716 |
| 🇯🇲 Ashmeade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.2 | 80 | 160.33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TakahashiRetired | AshmeadeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World record marathon | 2.195 | — |
| Berlin Marathon wins | 2 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 1 | — |
| Tokyo Marathon wins | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 9.9 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 19.85 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Takahashi80.7
Ashmeade80.6
FAQ
Where does Ashmeade beat Takahashi?
Ashmeade scores higher on statistics, longevity. Takahashi leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Takahashi vs Ashmeade score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Takahashi: 80.7, Ashmeade: 80.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Takahashi vs Ashmeade. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.