GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Osaka vs Vondroušová

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
VondroušováWinner
76.9

Vondroušová wins: Peak, Honours

Osaka
76.5

Osaka wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/naomi-osaka-vs-marketa-vondrousova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇿 Markéta Vondroušová
76.9

Vondroušová leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. First unseeded woman to win Wimbledon, in 2023.

1. Markéta Vondroušová
76.9
2. Naomi Osaka
76.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇿 Markéta Vondroušová5 seasons played · career day 2,1919 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka5 seasons played · career day 2,9214 titles
-55.6% vs Vondroušová at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Osaka000005
🇨🇿 Vondroušová0001615

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricOsakaActiveVondroušováActive
Grand Slam titles4
US Open titles2
Australian Open titles2
Weeks at No. 125
Career titles7
Year-end No. 11
Grand Slam singles titles1
Olympic medals1
WTA titles3
Grand Slam finals2
Billie Jean King Cup titles1
Dominance w25%7474
Peak w20%8890
Longevity w20%6664
Honours w20%7678
Statistics w15%8080

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Vondroušová76.9
Osaka76.5
The people
Osaka
Vondroušová

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Osaka vs Vondroušová. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →