Who is better, Inoue or Marciano?
Naoya Inoue leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Rocky Marciano — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Naoya Inoue and Rocky Marciano level at 86.3. Naoya Inoue leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Rocky Marciano leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Inoue wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Marciano wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/naoya-inoue-vs-rocky-marciano
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Inoue leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Inoue | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 24 |
| 🇺🇸 Marciano | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 36 | 47 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | InoueActive | MarcianoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Professional wins | 31 | — |
| Career losses | 0 | — |
| Wins by knockout | 27 | — |
| World titles in weight classes | 4 | — |
| Undisputed titles | 2 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Career wins | — | 49 |
| Career defeats | — | 0 |
| Knockouts | — | 43 |
| Title defences | — | 6 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Naoya Inoue leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.3 for Rocky Marciano — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Marciano scores higher on honours, longevity. Inoue leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Inoue: 86.3, Marciano: 86.3.
Make your case for Inoue vs Marciano. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.